Enterprise GenAI Implementation: From POC to Production

Technical guide to deploying Generative AI in production environments. RAG architectures, LLM selection, cost optimization, governance, and expert consulting recommendations.

90% of GenAI POCs fail to reach production. This guide covers the technical decisions that separate successful deployments from failed experiments: architecture patterns, model selection, cost management, and operational readiness.

GenAI Architecture Patterns

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)

When to Use

  • • Knowledge needs to stay current (documents, policies)
  • • Need to cite sources and provide explainability
  • • Limited training data for fine-tuning
  • • Must avoid hallucinations on critical facts
  • • Multi-tenant with different knowledge bases

Key Components

  • • Vector database (Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, pgvector)
  • • Embedding model (OpenAI ada-002, Cohere, BGE)
  • • Chunking strategy (semantic, fixed-size, overlap)
  • • Retrieval optimization (hybrid search, re-ranking)
  • • Context window management

Typical Cost Structure

Vector DB: $500-$5,000/month | Embedding: $0.0001/1K tokens | LLM: $0.01-0.03/1K tokens
Total for 1M queries/month: $8,000-$25,000

Fine-Tuning

When to Use

  • • Consistent style/format requirements (brand voice)
  • • Specialized domain language (legal, medical)
  • • High-volume, low-latency requirements
  • • Reducing prompt size for cost optimization
  • • Teaching specific reasoning patterns

Requirements

  • • 500-10,000+ high-quality training examples
  • • Clear evaluation metrics and test sets
  • • GPU infrastructure (A100, H100) or cloud APIs
  • • MLOps pipeline for model versioning
  • • Continuous evaluation for drift detection

Typical Cost Structure

Training: $100-$5,000 per fine-tune (GPT-3.5: ~$100, GPT-4: ~$2,000-5,000)
Inference: 2-3x cheaper than base model with shorter prompts
Total for 1M queries/month: $3,000-$10,000 (after initial training)

Agentic AI (Multi-Step Reasoning)

When to Use

  • • Complex workflows requiring multiple tools
  • • Tasks needing planning and reasoning
  • • Integration with external APIs and databases
  • • Dynamic problem-solving (not fixed templates)
  • • Human-in-the-loop workflows

Key Components

  • • Orchestration framework (LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI)
  • • Tool definitions and function calling
  • • Memory management (conversation, episodic)
  • • Safety guardrails and output validation
  • • Monitoring and observability (LangSmith, Weights & Biases)

Warning: Higher Risk

Agentic systems have higher latency (10-60s), higher cost (multiple LLM calls), and increased risk of hallucination or unintended actions. Start with constrained use cases and extensive testing.

LLM Selection Matrix

ModelBest ForCost/1K tokensContext WindowConsiderations
GPT-4 TurboComplex reasoning, code generation$0.01-0.03128K tokensIndustry standard, best ecosystem support
Claude 3.5 SonnetAnalysis, safety-critical, long documents$0.003-0.015200K tokensStrong safety, excellent for enterprises
Llama 3.1 (70B/405B)On-premise, data sovereigntyInfra costs only128K tokensOpen source, requires GPU infrastructure
GPT-3.5 TurboHigh-volume, cost-sensitive tasks$0.0005-0.001516K tokens10x cheaper than GPT-4, good for simple tasks
Mistral LargeEuropean data residency$0.004-0.01232K tokensEU-compliant, competitive performance

Top GenAI Consulting Firms

Accenture

Dublin, Ireland

GenAI: 5/5Overall: 9.6/10

Global leader in enterprise data transformation with comprehensive capabilities from strategy through managed services. Platform Factory reduces GenAI deployment time by 30%.

Rate:$150-300+/hr
Min Project:$250,000+

McKinsey QuantumBlack

New York, USA

GenAI: 5/5Overall: 9/10

Premium strategy house with specialized AI practice. Delivered 40% warehouse efficiency improvement through supply chain optimization. C-suite engagement focus.

Rate:$300-500+/hr
Min Project:$500,000+

Quantiphi

Marlborough, USA

GenAI: 5/5Overall: 9/10

AI-first consultancy with strong cloud and MLOps focus. Google Cloud Premier Partner with advanced AI capabilities.

Rate:$100-200/hr
Min Project:$50,000+

BCG Gamma

Boston, USA

GenAI: 5/5Overall: 8.9/10

Strategic consulting with deep AI capabilities. Focus on connecting business strategy with advanced analytics and ML model deployment.

Rate:$300-500+/hr
Min Project:$500,000+

Fractal Analytics

Mumbai, India / New York, USA

GenAI: 5/5Overall: 7/10

Specialized analytics boutique with deep AI and decision science expertise. Proprietary frameworks and industry accelerators.

Rate:$100-250/hr
Min Project:$100,000+

Databricks Professional Services

San Francisco, USA

GenAI: 5/5Overall: 6.8/10

Official Databricks consulting services. Deep platform expertise for Lakehouse architecture and MLOps implementations.

Rate:$200-350/hr
Min Project:$100,000+

Deloitte

New York, USA

GenAI: 4/5Overall: 9.4/10

Big Four leader with 800+ clients on Deloitte Fabric platform. 92% renewal rate. Strong governance frameworks and compliance focus for regulated industries.

Rate:$150-300/hr
Min Project:$250,000+

IBM Consulting

Armonk, USA

GenAI: 4/5Overall: 9.1/10

Enterprise consulting with proprietary Watson AI platform and hybrid cloud expertise. Strong in healthcare and financial services.

Rate:$150-300/hr
Min Project:$250,000+

Capgemini

Paris, France

GenAI: 4/5Overall: 8.4/10

European systems integrator with strong industry focus. Comprehensive cloud and analytics capabilities.

Rate:$150-300/hr
Min Project:$150,000+

Production Readiness Checklist

Technical Requirements

  • Rate limiting and retry logic for API failures
  • Model versioning and A/B testing infrastructure
  • Input/output validation and sanitization
  • Latency monitoring (P50, P95, P99)
  • Cost tracking and budget alerts
  • Caching layer for repeated queries
  • Fallback to alternative models (multi-provider)

Governance & Safety

  • Content moderation for harmful outputs
  • PII detection and masking in prompts
  • Audit logging for all LLM interactions
  • Human review workflows for high-stakes decisions
  • Model card documentation (capabilities, limitations)
  • Bias testing and fairness evaluation
  • Data retention and privacy compliance

Common Failure Modes

1. Underestimating Data Quality Requirements

RAG systems are only as good as the documents they retrieve. Outdated, inconsistent, or poorly structured content leads to poor responses. Budget 40-60% of project time for data preparation.

2. Ignoring Cost at Scale

POC costs of $100/month can explode to $50K+/month at production scale. Implement cost monitoring, caching, and model routing (expensive model only when needed) from day one.

3. Skipping Evaluation Frameworks

“It looks good” is not a metric. Define specific evaluation criteria: relevance, faithfulness, answer correctness, response time. Automate evaluation with LLM-as-judge and human spot checks.

4. No Observability

Production issues are invisible without proper logging. Track: latency per step, token usage, retrieval quality scores, user feedback, error rates. Tools: LangSmith, Arize, Weights & Biases.

5. Treating LLM as Deterministic

Same prompt can produce different outputs. Account for variability in downstream systems. Use temperature=0 for consistency, implement output parsing with error handling, validate structured outputs.

Project Cost Estimates

Project TypeImplementation CostTimelineOngoing Monthly
RAG Chatbot (Internal Knowledge)$100K - $400K3-6 months$5K-$20K (API + infra)
Customer-Facing GenAI Product$300K - $1M+6-12 months$20K-$100K+ (scale dependent)
Document Processing Pipeline$150K - $500K4-8 months$8K-$30K (volume dependent)
Agentic Workflow System$400K - $1.5M+9-18 months$30K-$150K+ (complexity dependent)
Fine-Tuned Domain Model$200K - $800K4-10 months$10K-$50K (retraining cycles)